Part 1
The benefits of being a hunter gatherer are that these people
have a more balanced diet and they are not affected by famines as severely as
farmers are. They have lots of leisure time and do not live the typical poverty
filled lives that people like to think. Another benefit is food sharing. When hunter
gathers hunt, they do not keep for themselves what they find but instead share
it with those in their community. In turn when another hunter comes back with food,
he will share with them in return. Lastly, because of the nature of the hunter
gatherer lifestyle, men and women’s roles are not fixed. Sometimes in these communities,
the woman will be the one providing most of the food for her family, not
because the man is lazy but because that is simply how it works.
The benefits of agriculture are that settlements arose because
people could no longer wander around from place to place but had to stay where
they planted their food. Because of the surplus of food, other people who were
not needed to help run the farm could focus on developing farming equipment.
Because of agriculture, societies became organized and tools, pottery and
houses were created. Lastly, agriculture caused people to be able to grow
things that could not normally be found in the area they lived in providing
more of a variety to their diet and any surplus they had could be traded for
those things they could not produce but others could.
The disadvantages of being a hunter gatherer is that you are
completely dependant on the earth for survival, what the earth provides you
eat. If there is no food, you go hungry. You have to be in constant search for
food because of this lifestyle and you cannot stockpile. You are always moving
and therefore have to be in constant search of food.
The disadvantages of agriculture is that it is dominated by
more powerful groups and markets which
makes it so farmers do not have as much control. Weather also poses a problem
for the farmer as does the problem of having to find a way to get water to your
crops.
I believe that the hunter gatherer subsistence provides a
healthier way of life. They do not find themselves with a surplus of food; therefore,
they will not have problems with over indulging. They gatherer only as much as
they need. They also have a wide variety of food because of how much they move
around. They will have a more balanced diet.
Humans transitioned to agriculture because tools were developed
and animals and plants were domesticated so they could use them to their
advantage. And once these people started to plant crops, they could no longer
have a mobile way of life because crops have to be tended and watched.
Part 2
There is a direct relationship between the availability of
surplus and the ability to trade because without surplus, there would be
nothing to trade. People from economic systems where trading is the foundation of
their livelihood, depend upon the extra that they will have as a means of
trading and obtaining goods they cannot produce themselves.
The first social benefit of trade is that it is a means of
obtaining things that you would otherwise not been able to obtain. In trade
markets people from different areas come together and trade for things that
they might not be able to produce on their own. The second benefit is that you
create relationships and social ties with those you trade with. You broaden
your horizons and create relationships with people who might in the future be
able to help or assist you should you need it in the future.
The first negative result of trade is that you are not a
self sufficient people because you rely on others for the things you do not
have. You are in a sense, at their mercy just like they are at yours. The
second negative result is that there is an easier opportunity to be taken advantage
of. Because you are trading different objects if could be hard to determine
what is an equal trade, especially if there is a language barrier. One group of
people might try to take advantage of another by not “giving” as much as they
are “receiving.”
Because of the development of agriculture, there has been
something to trade! When people started planting gardens and farming land, they
could control how much food they produced and therefore have a surplus which they
were able to trade with.
Overall, good post, and I like the way you talk about how the subsistence patterns influenced social/gender role patterns in the culture.
ReplyDeleteYou say: "Humans transitioned to agriculture because tools were developed and animals and plants were domesticated so they could use them to their advantage."
This is what happened AFTER people started to develop agriculture. It doesn't explain why they started to adopt food production techniques to begin with.
Good discussion on trade.
"The disadvantages of agriculture is that it is dominated by more powerful groups and markets which makes it so farmers do not have as much control." I think this statement is spot on in describing the current agricultural set up that exists here in the US. The system that we have is broken. There are government subsidies that favor certain crops over others which leads to an unbalanced surplus. There are laws that favor large agribusinesses over small farms. Many of those agribusinesses utilize questionable practices that puts our food supply in danger. The average piece of produce in our stores travels and average of 1000 miles. If that infrastructure breaks down our food supply is in jeopardy. I recently read "Animal, Vegetable, Miracle" by Barbara Kingsolver and it really was eye-opening.
ReplyDeleteYou did really great descriptions and explanations in Part 2!!
I liked your social benefits of trade. I agree that people would be able to obtain things that they might not be able to get if they are not trading things. I think it would open doors for others to be able to grow things they maybe did not think of growing before. I would have to agree that it would broaden their horizons and grow to meet other people that they might not have meet before trading begun. I did not think of the language barrier and maybe getting taken advantage of until I read your post and I would have to agree. If people do not speak the same language they might not know what is a good trade, or price for something they need which might cause a confusion or frustration between the people who are trading things.
ReplyDelete